Is QuantumScape's Capital-Light Model Finally Paying Off?

QuantumScape Corp.’s QS business model is starting to show results. The company has a capital-light approach focused on licensing and development work rather than large-scale manufacturing. In Q3 2025, investors saw early proof of that model in motion. QuantumScape reported $12.8 million in customer billings, the company’s first measurable cash inflows from partner work. This marks a shift from the research stage toward commercial traction.

The capital-light strategy hinges on three revenue streams. First, QuantumScape earns near-term payments for joint development and customization work with automakers such as Volkswagen’s PowerCo. Second, it expects to collect royalties and licensing fees once customers begin producing cells using its solid-state technology. Third, management sees future value-sharing opportunities from its expanding manufacturing ecosystem, which now includes global partners like Murata and Corning. These relationships help QS scale ceramic separator production without heavy investment in facilities or equipment, keeping spending lean while leveraging partner expertise.

Financially, the results are beginning to reflect this discipline. In Q3, QuantumScape reported an adjusted EBITDA loss of $61.4 million, in line with expectations, and trimmed its full-year loss guidance to $245-$260 million. Capital expenditures were just $9.6 million in Q3, and the full-year forecast has been reduced to $30-$40 million, below the previous guidance of $45-$65 million, as efficiency gains from the new Cobra separator process reduced equipment needs. The company ended the quarter with $1 billion in liquidity, extending its cash runway through the end of the decade.

As QuantumScape aims to commercialize breakthrough battery technology without the capital burden of gigafactories, its business model is capital-light. And Q3’s progress suggests that the business model that once looked theoretical is beginning to deliver tangible results.

How do SLDP & SES AI Business Models Look?

Solid Power SLDP follows a hybrid business model built around selling its proprietary solid electrolyte materials and licensing its solid-state battery designs and manufacturing technology. Unlike traditional battery makers, Solid Power is not investing in large gigafactories, but it does run pilot production lines for electrolytes and prototype cells. This gives Solid Power a slightly more manufacturing-heavy footprint compared to QuantumScape’s highly capital-light approach.

SES AI SES takes a different path, using an AI-driven materials discovery platform to develop next-generation lithium-metal batteries. SES AI partners with major automakers for production instead of building its own large-scale plants, keeping operations asset-light. SES AI also seeks to monetize its “Molecular Universe” platform through licensing and royalty-based deals. SES AI follows a capital-light model, but its strength lies in software and data rather than QuantumScape’s core battery cell and materials technology.

The Zacks Rundown on QuantumScape

Shares of QS have jumped more than 211% over the past year, breezing past the industry.

QuantumScape currently has an average brokerage recommendation (ABR) of 3.44 on a scale of 1 to 5 (Strong Buy to Strong Sell), calculated based on the actual recommendations (Buy, Hold, Sell, etc.) made by nine brokerage firms. 

See how the Zacks Consensus Estimate for QS’ earnings has been revised over the past 90 days.

The stock currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report

This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).

Zacks Investment Research