New: Evolving the Heatmap: Dow Jones, Nasdaq 100, Russell 2000, and More

Learn More

Is Google Developing an XRP Killer?

By Leo Sun | September 20, 2025, 11:21 AM

Key Points

  • Google aims to disrupt SWIFT transfers with its own blockchain platform.

  • It's a more centralized and tightly regulated platform than Ripple’s XRP Ledger.

  • Both of these blockchains could thrive without directly competing against each other.

Alphabet's (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) Google recently unveiled its Google Cloud Universal Ledger (GCUL), which has a lot in common with Ripple Labs' XRP (CRYPTO: XRP) Ledger (XRPL). Both blockchains provide faster, cheaper, and more secure financial transactions than traditional SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication) transfers, and they both support cross-border transfers, automated payments, integrations with third-party digital wallets, and tokenized assets.

That announcement might alarm Ripple's users and XRP's investors, but is Google really trying to kill XRP? Let's review the key similarities and differences to find out.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

An illustration of a volatile chart.

Image source: Getty Images.

The similarities and differences between GCUL and XRPL

GCUL and XRPL are both designed to facilitate faster financial transactions, but there are three key differences.

First, GCUL is a centralized private platform that is only open to vetted and approved institutions. It's geared toward regulatory compliance, stability, and institutional control, with Google Cloud initially managing its governance and infrastructure services.

XRPL is a decentralized public platform that anyone can access. Its validators are spread out across the world instead of being corralled within a single company. That can be a double-edged sword: It can be more freely accessed than GCUL, but the lack of a vetting and approval process exposes it to more illegal transactions.

Second, GCUL doesn't have its own native token. XRPL has a native token, XRP, which is mainly used to satisfy its settlements, fees, and reserve requirements. XRPL's fees are low, but its fees rise as its network activity increases. GCUL charges predictable monthly fees instead of relying on volatile fees driven by the blockchain system's "tokenomics."

XRPL also has its own native stablecoin, Ripple USD (CRYPTO: RLUSD), which is pegged to the U.S. dollar. Both Ripple USD and XRP are frequently used for bridge currency transfers -- in which two volatile or illiquid currencies are directly converted to the native token as a "bridge" instead of being converted to a third fiat currency (like the U.S. dollar) in a slower and pricier transaction. Without its own tokens, GCUL will likely underperform XRPL in those bridge currency transfers.

Lastly, GCUL natively supports smart contracts, which are used in the development of blockchain-based applications. XRPL only natively supports lightweight "hooks" for developing simpler programs, but it's reportedly been mulling the development of "sidechains" to integrate more Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH)-based smart contracts into its ledger.

Is GCUL a threat to XRPL?

Google's GCUL could be an appealing option for larger banks, clearinghouses, and asset managers who prefer a tightly regulated platform with predictable fees. It could also be a natural fit for large enterprise customers that are already locked into Google's cloud-based services.

However, XRPL's decentralized approach, resistance to regulators, and lower fees should make it more appealing to individual users and smaller financial institutions who don't want to lock themselves into Google's ecosystem. Google is also approving GCUL's customers on a strict case-by-case basis, which could drive more customers to XRPL due to the sluggish process.

Moreover, Google doesn't plan to officially launch GCUL until 2026. Before that happens, a few major catalysts could spark XRPL's near-term expansion: the increased adoption of Ripple USD as an alternative to the U.S. dollar; the approvals of XRP's first spot price exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in October and November, and the rollout of more sidechains to support the development of decentralized apps (dApps) and other crypto assets.

XRPL has already partnered with more than 300 banks worldwide, so there could plenty of room for both of these blockchains to flourish without trampling each other. XRPL and GCUL certainly have plenty of overlapping interests, but it's premature to call the latter -- or any other newcomer -- an "XRP killer" before it even launches.

Should you invest $1,000 in Alphabet right now?

Before you buy stock in Alphabet, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Alphabet wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $661,694!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,082,963!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,067% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 189% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of September 15, 2025

Leo Sun has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Ethereum, and XRP. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Latest News